TRANSATLANTIC DEFENSE COOPERATION IN THE ERA OF GREAT TRANSFORMATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CHINA
Abstract
Research Paper
DOI: 10.37458/ssj.4.2.5
In the background of the great transformation of international situation, and with the purpose of jointly safeguarding the ‘liberal international order’, the defense cooperation between Europe and the US is developing rapidly. This includes improving the cooperation in bilateral and global levels. However, as the EU is pursuing strategic autonomy and defense independence, the transatlantic defense cooperation is facing structural challenges brought by gaps of willingness, goals, interests and capabilities between the two sides. Therefore, although the transatlantic defense cooperation will continue to deepen in the future, it will not develop smoothly. The transatlantic defense cooperation will have negative impacts on China, like the de-stabilizing of international and regional situation needed by Chinese economic prosperity. However, due to the differences in defense positions and capabilities between Europe and the US, the negative impacts of transatlantic defense cooperation on China are limited.
References
[2] Bergmann, Max, and Sophia Besch, “Why European Defense Still Depends on America,” Foreign Affairs, March 7, 2023.
[3] Brattberg, Erik, and Tomáš Valášek, “EU Defense Cooperation: Progress amid Transatl-antic Concerns,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/11/21/eu-defense-cooperation-progress-amid-transatlantic-concerns-pub-80381.
[4] Burton, Brian, “Europe Should Not Try to Go It Alone on Defense,” War on the Ro-cks, May 18, 2023, https://warontherocks.com/2023/05/europe-should-not-try-to-go-it-alone-on-defense/.
[5] Council of the European Union, “A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence,” March 21, 2022, pp. 53-61.
[6] Covington, “Transatlantic Defense Cooperation: Implications for U.S. and UK Industry,” June 11, 2021, https://www.cov.com/en/news-and-insights/insights/2021/06/transatlantic-defense-cooperation-implications-for-us-and-uk-industry.
[7] De Maio, Giovanna, “Opportunities to Deepen NATO-EU Cooperation,” Brookings, De-cember 2021, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/FP_20211203_nato_eu_cooperation_demaio.pdf.
[8] Doyle, Michael W., “A Liberal View: Preserving and Expanding the Liberal Pacific Order,” in T.V. Paul and John A. Hall eds., International Order and the Future of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[9] Dolan, Chris J., The Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy and NATO: Continuity and Change From The Cold War to the Rise of China, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, pp. 165-174.
[10] Droin, Mathieu, “NATO and the European Union: The Burden of Sharing,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, https://www.csis.org/analysis/nato-and-european-union-burden-sharing.
[11] DW, “France will reorganize military bases in Africa, says Macron,” February 27, 2023, https://www.dw.com/en/france-will-reorganize-military-bases-in-africa-says-macron/a-64836040.
[12] Ellehuus, Rachel, “Avoiding Barriers to Greater Transatlantic Defense Cooperation,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, https://www.csis.org/analysis/avoiding-barriers-greater-transatlantic-defense-cooperation.
[13] European Commission, “The EU Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific,” https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/jointcommunication_2021_24_1_en.pdf.
[14] European Council, “Joint Declaration on EU-NATO Cooperation, 10 January 2023,” Ja-nuary 10, 2023, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/01/10/eu-nato-joint-declaration-10-january-2023/
[15] Fiott, Daniel, “The Poison Pill: EU Defence on US Terms?” European Union Institutefor Security Studies, June 2019, https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/7%20US-EU%20defence%20industries.pdf.
[16] Franke, Ulrike, “Artificial Divide: How Europe and America Could Clash over AI,” European Council on Foreign Relations, January 2021, https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/Artificial-divide-How-Europe-and-America-could-clash-over-AI.pdf.
[17] Fukuyama, Francis, “Putin’s War on the Liberal Order,” Financial Times, March 4, 2022, https://www.ft.com/content/d0331b51-5d0e-4132-9f97-c3f41c7d75b3.
[18] Gheciu, Alexandra, “NATO, Liberal Internationalism, and the Politics of Imagining the Western Security Community,” International Journal, Vol. 74, No. 1, 2019, pp, 32-46.
[19] Karnitschnig, Matthew, and Wojciech Kość, “Meet Europe’s Coming Military Superpower: Poland,” Politico, November 21, 2022, https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-military-superpower-poland-army/.
[20] Lau, Stuart, and Laura Kayali, “Macron Blocks NATO Outpost in Japan amid Chinese Complaints,” Politico, July 7, 2023, https://www.politico.eu/article/emmanuel-macron-block-nato-outpost-japan-china-complaints/.
[21] Lippert, Barbara, et al eds., “European Strategic Autonomy: Actors, Issues, Conflicts of Interests,” German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP Research Paper 4, March 2019.
[22] Matthijs, Matthias, “Democracy and the NATO Alliance: Upholding Our Shared Demo-cratic Values,” Council on Foreign Relations, November 13, 2019, https://www.cfr.org/report/democracy-and-nato-alliance-upholding-our-shared-democratic-values.
[23] Monaghan, Sean, “Solving Europe’s Defense Dilemma: Overcoming the Challenges to European Defense Cooperation,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, https://www.csis.org/analysis/solving-europes-defense-dilemma-overcoming-challenges-european-defense-cooperation.
[24] NATO, “NATO 2022 Strategic Concept,” June 29, 2022.
[25] NATO, “Relations with the European Union,” April 4, 2023, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49217.htm.
[26] Puglierin, Jana, and Pawel Zerka, “Keeping America Close, Russia Down, and China Far Away: How Europeans Navigate a Competitive World,” European Council on Foreign Relations, June 7, 2023, https://ecfr.eu/publication/keeping-america-close-russia-down-and-china-far-away-how-europeans-navigate-a-competitive-world/.
[27] Rajagopalan, Rajeswari Pillai, “India, France Conclude Garuda Exercise 2022,” The Diplomat, November 18, 2022, https://thediplomat.com/2022/11/india-france-conclude-garuda-exercise-2022/.
[28] Ringhof, Julian, “Setting the Tone: The Value of the EU-US Trade and Technology Council,” European Council on Foreign Relations, December 9, 2022, https://ecfr.eu/article/setting-the-tone-the-value-of-the-eu-us-trade-and-technology-council/.
[29] Singh, Michael, “US-Europe Security Cooperation at the Crossroads,” The Washington Institute, November 2022, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/us-europe-security-cooperation-crossroads.
[30] The White House, “Fact Sheet: U.S.-EU Counterterrorism Cooperation,” March 26, 2014, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/26/fact-sheet-us-eu-counterterrorism-cooperation.
[31] The White House, “Fact Sheet: NATO Summit: Revitalizing the Transatlantic Alliance,” June 13, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/13/fact-sheet-nato-summit-revitalizing-the-transatlantic-alliance/.
[32] The White House, “National Security Strategy,” October 2022, pp. 38-39.
[33] The White House, “G7 Hiroshima Leaders’ Communiqué,” May 20, 2023, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/05/20/g7-hiroshima-leaders-communique/.
[34] Turak, Natasha, “Conflict, Politics and History: Why Turkey is Standing in the Way of Sweden and Finland’s NATO Bids,” CNBC, May 23, 2022, https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/23/why-turkey-doesnt-want-sweden-finland-to-join-nato.html.
[35] US Department of Defense, “Act Sheet - U.S. Defense Contributions to Europe,” June 29, 2022, https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3078056/fact-sheet-us-defense-contributions-to-europe/.
[36] von Hein, Matthias, “German Military Ramps up Indo-Pacific Presence,” DW, March 9, 2022, https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-military-ramps-up-presence-in-indo-pacific/a-63005063.
© 2020 Security Science Journal. All rights reserved