INTELLIGENCE FUNCTIONS OF COMMUNICATIVE DIMENSIONS IN THE SARS-COV2 PANDEMIC -TOWARDS COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE WITH MEDINT?
Abstract
Research Paper
DOI: 10.37458/ssj.5.2.5
The aim of this study is to illustrate some of the strengths and weaknesses of three main communicative dimensions that have served intelligence functions in the interest of national security during the Sars-Cov2 pandemic crisis. The selected communicative dimensions relate to the American intelligence dissemination process, the Italian epidemic intelligence coordination and the public communication, within the specific framework of crisis state governance. The information was gathered mainly from OSINT sources, while ITS analysis followed both a deductive and an inductive approach. Highlights show that MEDINT could benefit from collective intelligence in the future. In the context of a global pandemic crisis, this raises two further key questions: Should intelligence include its own communicative dimension, in addition to information, within its boundaries of interest and surveillance? And, would it benefit from appropriate training and revision of the division between intelligence reporting and policy advice?
The topic is relevant for monitoring the balance between the dimension of secrecy and the dimension of transparency, both of which concern the intelligence services, both in terms of national security and in terms of the participatory democratic state in which the intelligence services operate in Italy, starting from the Italian reform of Law 124/2007.
References
Caligiuri, M. (2020). Francesco Cossiga o della necessità di uomini di Stato, Formiche.net 16 agosto 2020. https://formiche.net/2020/08/francesco-cossiga-o-della-necessita-di-uomini-di-stato/#content (Accessed April 5, 2024)
CTS, Verbale n.21, 7 marzo 2020.https://www.fondazioneluigieinaudi.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/verbale-n-21-del-7-marzo-2020.pdf (Accessed April 5, 2024)
Degaut, M. (2016). Spies and policymakers: Intelligence in the information age. Intelligence National Security 31, 509–531.
ECDC (2022). The EU experience in the first phase of COVID-19: implications for measuring preparedness, ECDC Technical Report. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19-the-EU-experience_1.pdf (Accessed April 18, 2024)
Ministero della Salute (2021), COVID-19 Numero di pubblica utilità 1500. Relazione illustrativa numero di pubblica utilità. A cura della Direzione Generale della comunicazione e dei rapporti europei e internazionali – Ufficio 2. pp.11.
Gordon, S. (2019). Former Trump Administration Officials on National Security. Washington, DC: Women's Foreign Policy Group. https://www.c-span.org/video/?466944-3/trump-administration-officials-national-security (Accessed April 18, 2024)
Lankford, A.M., Storzieri, D., & Fitsanakis, J. (2020). Spies and the Virus: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Intelligence Communication in the United States. Frontiers in Communication, 5:11. doi=10.3389/fcomm.2020.582245.
Lombardi, M. (2020). Crisi Comunicativa: Covid-19. Dopo Chernobyl niente. Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Società, (12): 19-30.
Mauss, M. (2002). Saggio sul dono. Forma e motivo dello scambio nelle società arcaiche, Einaudi, Torino.
Merler, S. (2019), Scenari di diffusione di 2019-NCov in Italia e impatto sul servizio sanitario, in caso il virus non possa essere contenuto localmente. https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_3005_1_alleg.pdf (Accessed April 5, 2024)
Ministero della Salute, (2023). Piano nazionale di comunicazione del rischio pandemico. Quadro strategico, strutturale e procedurale 2023-2028 ad interim.
https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pagineAree_722_0_file.pdf (Accessed April 18, 2024)
Paquet, C., Coulombier D., Kaiser, R., Ciotti, M. (2006). Epidemic intelligence: a new framework for strengthening disease surveillance in Europe”. Eurosurveillance, Vol. 11, Issue 12.
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Sistema di Informazione per la Sicurezza della Repubblica (2019), Glossario Intelligence-Il Linguaggio degli Organismi Informativi.
Riccardo, F., Guzzetta, G., Urdiales, A.M., Del Manso, M., Andrianou, X.D., Bella, A., Pezzotti, P., Carbone, S., De Vito, T., Maraglino, F., Demicheli, V., Dario, C., Coscioni, E., Rezza, G., Urbani, A., Merler, S., Brusaferro, S. Italian COVID-19 monitoring group, (2021). COVID-19 response: effectiveness of weekly rapid risk assessments, Italy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2022 Feb 1;100(2):161-167.
United Nations Security Council, (2020). Resolution 2532. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/ltd/n20/169/84/pdf/n2016984.pdf?token=WMdS9Qdvbo7QdUUS2x&fe=true (Accessed April 26, 2024)
WHO, (2006). Constitution of the World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/gb/gov/assets/constitution-en.pdf (Accessed April 26, 2024)
Wilder, D.C. (2011). An educated consumer is our best customer. Studies in Intelligence 55, 23-32.
Italian Laws
Legge 3 agosto 2007, n. 124. GU Serie Generale n.187 del 13-08-2007.
DPCM 5 maggio 2010, GU Serie Generale n.139 del 17-06-2010.
DPCM 8 marzo 2020, GU Serie Generale n. 60 del 08-03-2020.
© 2020 Security Science Journal. All rights reserved